Social Champ vs Openpost

In-depth architectural comparison of the Social Champ and Openpost MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Social Champ when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Social Champ Details

O

Choose Openpost when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Openpost Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Social Champ Developer Tools	O Openpost Developer Tools
Summary	Connect AI agents to Social Champ: manage channels, posts, AI content, queue, and approvals.	Manage social publishing workflows through OpenPost
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "social-champ": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "socialchamp-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openpost": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "openpost"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons