Smeltr Token 2022 vs AstraNL

In-depth architectural comparison of the Smeltr Token 2022 and AstraNL MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Smeltr Token 2022 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Smeltr Token 2022 Details

Choose AstraNL when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AstraNL Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Smeltr Token 2022 Finance & Fintech	AstraNL Finance & Fintech
Summary	Validate Token-2022 configs (transfer fee, soulbound, delegate). Read-only — no keys or RPC.	NL coordination protocol — 1% fee, agent-native, real Dutch merchant pricing. Open brain.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "smeltr-token-2022": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "smeltr-token-2022"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "astranl-3": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "smithery"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons