Slivingdoc vs ReMarkable MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Slivingdoc and ReMarkable MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Slivingdoc when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Slivingdoc Details

Choose ReMarkable MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ReMarkable MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Slivingdoc Developer Tools	ReMarkable MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Share ordinary text files between concurrent agents without silently overwriting edits.	Access your reMarkable tablet - read documents, browse files, extract text and OCR
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "slivingdoc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "slivingdoc",
        "serve",
        "--bucket",
        "my-notes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "remarkable-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "remarkable-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons