Sleepwalker vs Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sleepwalker and Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Sleepwalker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sleepwalker Details

V

Choose Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query_intelligence, get_market_pulse, get_topic_markets.

Explore Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Sleepwalker Developer Tools	V Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence Developer Tools
Summary	AI Visibility and Content Intelligence tools for Claude and MCP-compatible agents.	Prediction market intelligence for AI agents. Live data from Kalshi and Polymarket.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sleepwalker": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@sleepwalkerai/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "veynor-prediction-market-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "veynor-prediction-market-intelligence"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons