Skycloak vs Teztun

In-depth architectural comparison of the Skycloak and Teztun MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Skycloak when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Skycloak Details

Choose Teztun when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Teztun Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Skycloak Developer Tools	Teztun Developer Tools
Summary	Manage your Skycloak-hosted Keycloak: clusters, realms, apps, SSO and users, from any MCP client.	Manage TezTun tunnels, subdomains, and service tokens from any MCP-compatible AI client.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "skycloak-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skycloak-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "teztun": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@asadullokhn/teztun-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons