A side-by-side look at the SiteVitals and MCP Server MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose SiteVitals for monitoring work over a hosted endpoint; choose MCP Server for monitoring as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose SiteVitals when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
You want tools like list_sites, get_site_health, get_site_uptime.
list_sitesList all monitored sites with current health scores
get_site_healthDetailed scores and trends for a specific site
get_site_uptimeUptime history and downtime incidents (up to 90 days)
get_latest_checksLatest SEO, security and page speed check results
get_ssl_domain_statusSSL certificate and domain expiry status
MCP Server tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
SiteVitals is categorized under Monitoring and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. MCP Server belongs to Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick SiteVitals for monitoring work and MCP Server for monitoring.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
SiteVitals has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. MCP Server is listed as freemium — a free tier with paid plans. Auth: api key required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add sitevitals and visualsentinel-mcp-server as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, SiteVitals has a quality signal of 45/100 (Fair) with 2 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. MCP Server has 57/100 (Good) with 1 views, 0 installs and 1 GitHub stars.