Silent Brief MCP vs OpenWorkProof

In-depth architectural comparison of the Silent Brief MCP and OpenWorkProof MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Silent Brief MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_services, execute_document_service, check_job_status.

Explore Silent Brief MCP Details

Choose OpenWorkProof when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore OpenWorkProof Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Silent Brief MCP Legal	OpenWorkProof Legal
Summary	AI-generated legal and business documents. Pay XMR, no accounts, no KYC.	Verifiable execution for AI agents: Ed25519-signed work contracts and audit trails.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "silent-brief-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@silent-brief/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openworkproof": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "openworkproof"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons