Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP vs Figshare

In-depth architectural comparison of the Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP and Figshare MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP Details

Choose Figshare when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Figshare Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Shoumikdc Arxiv MCP Research	Figshare Research
Summary	Discover the latest arXiv papers by category and keyword. Control how many results you get to spee…	Figshare research outputs (datasets, papers, posters)
Category & Scope	Research	Research
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shoumikdc-arxiv-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "shoumikdc-arxiv-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "figshare": {
      "url": "https://api.figshare.com/v2/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons