Shinobi vs Trinity Lite

In-depth architectural comparison of the Shinobi and Trinity Lite MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Shinobi when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Persistent projects, tasks, and subtasks, Decision, plan, context, and note storage, Full-text and optional semantic recall.

Explore Shinobi Details

Choose Trinity Lite when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Capability-based and direct task dispatch, SQLite persistence for tasks and results, MCP access through 14 tools and 3 resources.

Explore Trinity Lite Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Shinobi Coding Agents	Trinity Lite Yomiracle Coding Agents
Summary
Category & Scope	Coding Agents	Coding Agents
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shinobi": {
      "url": "https://your-host/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yomiracle-trinity-lite": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "trinity-lite"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons