Sf Intelligence vs ThriveStack PLG CRM

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sf Intelligence and ThriveStack PLG CRM MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Sf Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sf Intelligence Details

Choose ThriveStack PLG CRM when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_accounts, get_account_details, get_active_users_summary.

Explore ThriveStack PLG CRM Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Sf Intelligence Customer Data Platforms	ThriveStack PLG CRM Customer Data Platforms
Summary	Offline, read-only MCP knowledge base for one Salesforce org's metadata, deps & impact.	ThriveStack PLG CRM analytics — query accounts, MAU/MTU, feature adoption, and PLG leads.
Category & Scope	Customer Data Platforms	Customer Data Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sf-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sf-intelligence"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "thrivestack-plg-crm": {
      "url": "https://api.app.thrivestack.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons