Servicegraph vs Tizona — Australian business identity tools

In-depth architectural comparison of the Servicegraph and Tizona — Australian business identity tools MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Servicegraph when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Servicegraph Details

T

Choose Tizona — Australian business identity tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tizona — Australian business identity tools Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Servicegraph Developer Tools	T Tizona — Australian business identity tools Developer Tools
Summary	Search 100k+ US professional-services firms by industry, services, location, size, ratings.	Australian identifier validation, GST arithmetic, fuzzy name matching, OFAC sanctions screening.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "servicegraph": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tizona-australian-business-identity-tools": {
      "url": "https://tizonaintelligence.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons