Sentralis Portfolio Risk vs DeFi Trading Agents

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sentralis Portfolio Risk and DeFi Trading Agents MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Sentralis Portfolio Risk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sentralis Portfolio Risk Details

Choose DeFi Trading Agents when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DeFi Trading Agents Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Sentralis Portfolio Risk Finance & Fintech	DeFi Trading Agents Finance & Fintech
Summary	Crypto portfolio risk analysis: VaR, scenarios, liquidity and correlation engines as MCP tools.	DeFi agent definitions JSON API - crypto trading portfolio management bots
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sentralis-portfolio-risk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sentralis-portfolio-risk"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "defi-trading-agents": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "defi-trading-agents"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons