Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Sentinel Hub vs Starfetch
In-depth architectural comparison of the Sentinel Hub and Starfetch MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Sentinel Hub
Aerospace & Astrodynamics · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Starfetch
Aerospace & Astrodynamics · Local stdio
Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Sentinel Hub if you need specialized Aerospace & Astrodynamics tools running via a local process. Choose Starfetch if your workspace requires Aerospace & Astrodynamics integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
S
Choose Sentinel Hub when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
S
Choose Starfetch when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Sentinel Hub Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Starfetch Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Sentinel Hub Configuration
Starfetch Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to Sentinel HubMore alternatives to StarfetchAerospace & Astrodynamics category hub