What is the key difference between SenderKit and ToFlow?

SenderKit belongs to the Communication category with local stdio execution, while ToFlow belongs to the Communication category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install SenderKit or ToFlow in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are SenderKit and ToFlow free or paid?

SenderKit operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). ToFlow operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

SenderKit lists 0 tools with 2 views and 1 GitHub stars. ToFlow lists 0 tools with 0 views and 4 GitHub stars.

Can I use both SenderKit and ToFlow together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

SenderKit vs ToFlow

In-depth architectural comparison of the SenderKit and ToFlow MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

SenderKit

Communication · Local stdio

Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

ToFlow

Communication · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose SenderKit if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose ToFlow if your workspace requires Communication integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose SenderKit when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SenderKit Details

Choose ToFlow when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ToFlow Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	SenderKit Communication	T ToFlow Communication
Summary	Build and send email, SMS, and push straight from your AI agent.	AI sales automation for toflow.ai — prospect, enrich, sequence across email, LinkedIn, WhatsApp.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

SenderKit Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

ToFlow Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

SenderKit Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "senderkit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ToFlow Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "toflow": {
      "url": "https://lobehub.com/badge/mcp/toflow-ai-toflow-mcp)](https://lobehub.com/mcp/toflow-ai-toflow-mcp"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

SenderKit is categorized under Communication and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, ToFlow belongs to Communication using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select SenderKit when you need capabilities focused on communication and ToFlow when you require tools for communication.

More alternatives to SenderKit More alternatives to ToFlow Communication category hub