SendCheck — EVM address verification (x402) vs Frisk

In-depth architectural comparison of the SendCheck — EVM address verification (x402) and Frisk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose SendCheck — EVM address verification (x402) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SendCheck — EVM address verification (x402) Details

Choose Frisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Frisk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S SendCheck — EVM address verification (x402) Finance & Fintech	Frisk Finance & Fintech
Summary	Pre-send EVM address checks: free pre-check, $0.01 check, $0.05 deep scan. x402: payment is auth.	Screen the counterparty of an x402 payment before an agent pays it. Runs offline by default.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sendcheck-evm-address-verification-x402": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sendcheck-evm-address-verification-x402"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "frisk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "frisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons