SEFAZ RO: NFC E Completa vs DETRAN AM: Veículo

In-depth architectural comparison of the SEFAZ RO: NFC E Completa and DETRAN AM: Veículo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose SEFAZ RO: NFC E Completa when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SEFAZ RO: NFC E Completa Details

D

Choose DETRAN AM: Veículo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DETRAN AM: Veículo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	SEFAZ RO: NFC E Completa Developer Tools	D DETRAN AM: Veículo Developer Tools
Summary	SEFAZ RO: NFC-e Completa, official-source lookup. Platform-hosted, pay per query with prepaid credit	DETRAN AM: Vehicle, official-source lookup. Platform-hosted, pay per query with prepaid credit.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sefaz-ro-nfc-e-completa": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sefaz-ro-nfc-e-completa"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "detran-am-ve-culo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "detran-am-ve-culo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons