What is the key difference between Securitytrails and Phishtank?

Securitytrails belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Phishtank belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Securitytrails or Phishtank in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Securitytrails and Phishtank free or paid?

Securitytrails operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Phishtank operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Securitytrails lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Phishtank lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Securitytrails and Phishtank together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Securitytrails vs Phishtank

In-depth architectural comparison of the Securitytrails and Phishtank MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Securitytrails

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Phishtank

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Securitytrails if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Phishtank if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Securitytrails when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Securitytrails Details

Choose Phishtank when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Phishtank Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Securitytrails Developer Tools	P Phishtank Developer Tools
Summary	SecurityTrails MCP — wraps SecurityTrails API (securitytrails.com)	PhishTank MCP — wraps PhishTank API (checkurl.phishtank.com)
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Securitytrails Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Phishtank Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Securitytrails Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "securitytrails": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "securitytrails"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Phishtank Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "phishtank": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "phishtank"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Securitytrails is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Phishtank belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Securitytrails when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Phishtank when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Securitytrails More alternatives to Phishtank Developer Tools category hub Canonical compare URL