MCP Timeserver vs Open Streetmap MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Timeserver and Open Streetmap MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Timeserver when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Location Services domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: datetime:// URI scheme for timezone-specific current time, Tool to get current local system time, Supports all standard timezone names.

Explore MCP Timeserver Details

Choose Open Streetmap MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Location Services domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: geocode_address, reverse_geocode, find_nearby_places.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Timeserver SecretiveShell Location Services	Open Streetmap MCP jagan-shanmugam Location Services
Summary	Access the time in any timezone and get the current local time	An OpenStreetMap MCP server with location-based services and geospatial data.
Category & Scope	Location Services

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "secretiveshell-mcp-timeserver": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "MCP-timeserver"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jagan-shanmugam-open-streetmap-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "osm-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons