Sec Form D vs Hub Equity MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sec Form D and Hub Equity MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Sec Form D when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sec Form D Details

Choose Hub Equity MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hub Equity MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Sec Form D Developer Tools	Hub Equity MCP Developer Tools
Summary	SEC Form D fundraising intelligence.	Standardized, restatement-aware SEC + European (ESEF) XBRL fundamentals, served to your agent.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sec-form-d": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sec-form-d"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hub-equity-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons