Search1API vs Surface — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Search1API vs Surface
A side-by-side look at the Search1API and Surface MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Search1API for search & data extraction work as a local process; choose Surface for search & data extraction as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Search1API when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Surface tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Search1API is categorized under Search & Data Extraction and uses a local stdio subprocess. Surface belongs to Search & Data Extraction and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Search1API for search & data extraction work and Surface for search & data extraction.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Search1API has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Surface is listed as freemium — a free tier with paid plans. Auth: api key required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add search1api and surface as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Search1API has a quality signal of 49/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 173 GitHub stars. Surface has 74/100 (Great) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.