SCRIPTMASTERLABS — Provider Trust MCP vs Remogram

In-depth architectural comparison of the SCRIPTMASTERLABS — Provider Trust MCP and Remogram MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose SCRIPTMASTERLABS — Provider Trust MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SCRIPTMASTERLABS — Provider Trust MCP Details

Choose Remogram when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Remogram Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S SCRIPTMASTERLABS — Provider Trust MCP Version Control	Remogram Version Control
Summary	Read-only MCP for provider identity, runtime, API, MCP, A2A, and x402 trust checks.	SCM & forge boundary MCP: normalized, typed JSON from attributed Gitea, GitLab, and GitHub providers
Category & Scope	Version Control	Version Control

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scriptmasterlabs-provider-trust-mcp": {
      "url": "https://gitlab.com/script-master-labs-llc-group/provider-trust"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "remogram": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons