ScreenVerity vs MCP Company Change Event Feed

In-depth architectural comparison of the ScreenVerity and MCP Company Change Event Feed MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose ScreenVerity when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: screen, sources, verify_receipt.

Explore ScreenVerity Details

Choose MCP Company Change Event Feed when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: domain, company_name, sources.

Explore MCP Company Change Event Feed Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S ScreenVerity Developer Tools	MCP Company Change Event Feed Developer Tools
Summary	Free U.S. exclusion, debarment and licence screening with a signed receipt of the lists checked.	Detect company changes across hiring, tech stack, funding, and firmographics. Returns only deltas.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "screenverity": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "screenverity-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-company-change-event-feed": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mambalabsdev/mcp-company-change-event-feed"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons