What is the main functional difference between ScreenMocks and Codegraphcontext?

ScreenMocks is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Codegraphcontext belongs to Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick ScreenMocks for developer tools work and Codegraphcontext for developer tools.

How do I install ScreenMocks or Codegraphcontext in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.

Are ScreenMocks and Codegraphcontext free to use, or do they require API keys?

ScreenMocks has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Codegraphcontext is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.

Can I run both ScreenMocks and Codegraphcontext at the same time in my AI client?

Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add screenmocks and shashankss1205-codegraphcontext as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, ScreenMocks has a quality signal of 37/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Codegraphcontext has 64/100 (Good) with 4 views, 0 installs and 4,270 GitHub stars.

ScreenMocks vs Codegraphcontext — MCP Server Comparison

ScreenMocks vs Codegraphcontext — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs

Feature & specification comparison

Rows where the two servers differ are marked.

Spec	S ScreenMocks	Codegraphcontext
Category	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal	37/100 · Fair	64/100 · Good
Install command	Confirmed	Confirmed
Transport	Remote HTTP/SSE	Local subprocess (stdio)
Auth	Not declared	No auth required
Pricing	Not declared	Free
Required env vars	None listed	None listed
Verified owner	Community listing	Community listing
GitHub stars	—	4,270
Directory activity	0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes	4 views 0 installs 0 upvotes
Tools	Not listed	Not listed
Full listing	View ScreenMocks	View Codegraphcontext

Ready-to-paste client configs

Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.

ScreenMocks

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "screenmocks": {
      "url": "https://www.screenmocks.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Codegraphcontext

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shashankss1205-codegraphcontext": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "kuzu"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ScreenMocks vs Codegraphcontext

Which MCP server should you choose?

S
Choose ScreenMocks when

Choose Codegraphcontext when

Feature & specification comparison

Tools & capabilities

ScreenMocks tools

Codegraphcontext tools

Ready-to-paste client configs

ScreenMocks

Codegraphcontext

Frequently asked questions

SChoose ScreenMocks when

Choose Codegraphcontext when

ScreenMocks tools

Codegraphcontext tools

ScreenMocks

Codegraphcontext

Frequently asked questions

What is the main functional difference between ScreenMocks and Codegraphcontext?

How do I install ScreenMocks or Codegraphcontext in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Are ScreenMocks and Codegraphcontext free to use, or do they require API keys?

Can I run both ScreenMocks and Codegraphcontext at the same time in my AI client?

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

Popular comparisons with ScreenMocks

Popular comparisons with Codegraphcontext

S
Choose ScreenMocks when