Scrapling MCP Server vs Spectrawl

In-depth architectural comparison of the Scrapling MCP Server and Spectrawl MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Scrapling MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Stealth HTTP fetching, Real-browser and headless fetching, CSS selector parsing.

Explore Scrapling MCP Server Details

Choose Spectrawl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: web_search, web_browse, web_act.

Explore Spectrawl Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Scrapling MCP Server Search & Data Extraction	Spectrawl FayAndXan Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Web scraping with stealth HTTP, real browsers, and Cloudflare bypass. CSS selectors supported.	Unified web layer for AI agents. Search (8 engines), stealth browse, cookie auth, and act on 24 platforms. 5,000 free searches/month via Gemini Grounded Search.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scrapling-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "scrapling"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fayandxan-spectrawl": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "spectrawl"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons