Scenariosim MCP vs EPANET MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Scenariosim MCP and EPANET MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Scenariosim MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Scenariosim MCP Details

Choose EPANET MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore EPANET MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Scenariosim MCP Developer Tools	EPANET MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Deterministic what-if & scenario simulation for AI agents: projections, sensitivity & break-even.	MCP server for EPANET water-distribution network simulation and scenario analysis.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scenariosim-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "scenariosim-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "epanet-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "epyt"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons