Gnome Desktop MCP vs Desktop Touch MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gnome Desktop MCP and Desktop Touch MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Gnome Desktop MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: screenshot, screenshot_window, screenshot_area.

Explore Gnome Desktop MCP Details

Choose Desktop Touch MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: desktop_discover, desktop_act, desktop_state.

Explore Desktop Touch MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Gnome Desktop MCP sbuysse OS Automation	Desktop Touch MCP Harusame64 OS Automation
Summary
Category & Scope	OS Automation	OS Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sbuysse-gnome-desktop-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "gnome-desktop-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "harusame64-desktop-touch-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons