Sanity vs Stellary Project Management MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sanity and Stellary Project Management MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Sanity when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query_documents, create_documents, patch_documents.

Explore Sanity Details

Choose Stellary Project Management MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Stellary Project Management MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Sanity Developer Tools	Stellary Project Management MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Direct access to your Sanity projects (content, datasets, releases, schemas) and agent rules	Connect AI assistants to Stellary projects, boards, documents, and governed agent workflows.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sanity": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sanity@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stellary-project-management-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons