Sandbox Env MCP vs Runeward

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sandbox Env MCP and Runeward MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Sandbox Env MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sandbox Env MCP Details

Choose Runeward when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Runeward Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Sandbox Env MCP Cloud Platforms	Runeward Cloud Platforms
Summary	Persistent Docker/SSH sandbox for AI agents: shell exec, file ops, audit log.	Governed execution cells for AI agents: Docker/K8s sandboxes with policy, audit, and approvals.
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sandbox-env-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sandbox-env-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "runeward": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "runeward"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons