Sanctions Screening vs 1inch MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sanctions Screening and 1inch MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Sanctions Screening when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sanctions Screening Details

Choose 1inch MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore 1inch MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Sanctions Screening Finance & Fintech	1inch MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	Deterministic sanctions screening for AI agents: OFAC, UN, EU, UK lists. x402 or API-key pay.	Doc search, intent & cross-chain swaps, limit orders, portfolio, spot prices, gas & all APIs.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sanctions-screening": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sanctions-screening"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "1inch-mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.1inch.com/mcp/protocol"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons