Salesforce vs Figma — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Salesforce vs Figma
In-depth architectural comparison of the Salesforce and Figma MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Salesforce
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 21/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Figma
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 21/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Salesforce if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Figma if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
S
Choose Salesforce when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Salesforce is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Figma belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Salesforce when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Figma when you require tools for developer tools.