Sail vs JunoJunHyun Festival Finder MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sail and JunoJunHyun Festival Finder MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Sail when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sail Details

Choose JunoJunHyun Festival Finder MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Art & Culture domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: KOPIS_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: KOPIS performance and festival lookup, Platform-independent core logic, Kakao PlayMCP adapter.

Explore JunoJunHyun Festival Finder MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Sail Developer Tools	JunoJunHyun Festival Finder MCP Art & Culture
Summary	Search places, compare ride-hailing options, and plan trotro minibus journeys.	Discover festivals worldwide by location, date, and genre. Compare options with key details like d…
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Art & Culture

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sail": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sail"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "junojunhyun-festival-finder-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "junojunhyun-festival-finder-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "KOPIS_API_KEY": "YOUR_KOPIS_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons