Ruv Swarm vs Sintegra CCC Completa

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ruv Swarm and Sintegra CCC Completa MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Ruv Swarm when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ruv Swarm Details

Choose Sintegra CCC Completa when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sintegra CCC Completa Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Ruv Swarm Developer Tools	Sintegra CCC Completa Developer Tools
Summary	Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration	Full lookup of the centralized taxpayer registry (CCC) in Sintegra for a person or company from the
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ruv-swarm": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ruv-swarm@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sintegra-ccc-completa": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sintegra-ccc-completa"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons