What is the key difference between Ruv Swarm and ScreenMocks?

Ruv Swarm belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while ScreenMocks belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Ruv Swarm or ScreenMocks in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Ruv Swarm and ScreenMocks free or paid?

Ruv Swarm operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). ScreenMocks operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Ruv Swarm lists 0 tools with 2 views and 380 GitHub stars. ScreenMocks lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Ruv Swarm and ScreenMocks together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Ruv Swarm vs ScreenMocks

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ruv Swarm and ScreenMocks MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Ruv Swarm

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

ScreenMocks

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Ruv Swarm if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose ScreenMocks if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ruv Swarm when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ruv Swarm Details

Choose ScreenMocks when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ScreenMocks Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Ruv Swarm Developer Tools	S ScreenMocks Developer Tools
Summary	Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration	Design and export App Store / Play Store screenshots, localized across all 48 App Store locales.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ruv Swarm Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

ScreenMocks Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Ruv Swarm Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ruv-swarm": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ruv-swarm@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ScreenMocks Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "screenmocks": {
      "url": "https://www.screenmocks.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Ruv Swarm is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, ScreenMocks belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Ruv Swarm when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and ScreenMocks when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Ruv Swarm More alternatives to ScreenMocks Developer Tools category hub