Runway Aleph MCP vs Flux MCP — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Runway Aleph MCP vs Flux MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Runway Aleph MCP and Flux MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Runway Aleph MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Flux MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Runway Aleph MCP if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Flux MCP if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
R
Choose Runway Aleph MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Runway Aleph MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Flux MCP belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Runway Aleph MCP when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Flux MCP when you require tools for developer tools.