Rune vs Security Feeds

In-depth architectural comparison of the Rune and Security Feeds MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Rune when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Rune Details

Choose Security Feeds when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Security Feeds Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Rune Developer Tools	Security Feeds Developer Tools
Summary	Evidence-traced codebase understanding and security scanning for AI agents over MCP.	Security Feeds MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rune": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-p",
        "@moosl/rune",
        "rune",
        "serve",
        "/absolute/path/to/your-project"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "security-feeds": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons