Rundeck MCP Server vs Huly MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Rundeck MCP Server and Huly MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Rundeck MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Rundeck MCP Server Details

H

Choose Huly MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Huly MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Rundeck MCP Server Developer Tools	H Huly MCP Developer Tools
Summary	50 tools to manage Rundeck jobs, executions, projects, nodes, and system via MCP	MCP server for Huly — manage issues, projects, members and more via Claude.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rundeck-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "rundeck-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "huly-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "huly-mcp-sdk"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons