RUAGENTIC Directory vs SandBase CLI

In-depth architectural comparison of the RUAGENTIC Directory and SandBase CLI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose RUAGENTIC Directory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aggregators domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore RUAGENTIC Directory Details

S

Choose SandBase CLI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aggregators domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: sandbase_discover, sandbase_inspect, sandbase_run.

Explore SandBase CLI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	RUAGENTIC Directory Aggregators	S SandBase CLI Aggregators
Summary	Search MCP servers, MCP clients and AI agents from an AI assistant. Two read-only tools, search_directory and get_listing, search public listings and return connection details. Free Streamable HTTP endpoint with no API key or local installation.	Open-source CLI and MCP server for discovering and calling 2,000+ AI models and APIs through one consistent developer interface.
Category & Scope	Aggregators

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ruagentic-directory": {
      "url": "https://ruagentic.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sandbase-cli": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "https"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons