Rpf vs Exiftool

In-depth architectural comparison of the Rpf and Exiftool MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Rpf when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Rpf Details

Choose Exiftool when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exiftool Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Rpf Developer Tools	Exiftool Developer Tools
Summary	Read and write RAGE Package Format archives	Read, write, and remove metadata from 150+ file formats using ExifTool
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rpf": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "rpf"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exiftool": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "exiftool-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons