A11ymcp vs Google Surf MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the A11ymcp and Google Surf MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose A11ymcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Accessibility testing of URLs and HTML strings, Supports WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 compliance levels, Customizable viewport dimensions for testing.

Explore A11ymcp Details

Choose Google Surf MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: extract_mode, extract, project_id.

Explore Google Surf MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A11ymcp ronantakizawa Browser Automation	Google Surf MCP Browser Automation
Summary	Web accessibility testing MCP server that analyzes URLs and HTML for WCAG 2.0/2.1/2.2 compliance using axe-core. Tools for color contrast, ARIA validation, and orientation lock detection.	Google search via Playwright with a warm Chrome profile. No API key, no proxies.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ronantakizawa-a11ymcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "a11y-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-surf-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-surf-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons