Roast My Design System vs Zambo

In-depth architectural comparison of the Roast My Design System and Zambo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Roast My Design System when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Deterministic repository scan, HTML audit report with file paths, 0–100 design-system score.

Explore Roast My Design System Details

Choose Zambo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: zambo_universal, journal_log, live_price.

Explore Zambo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Roast My Design System Developer Tools	Zambo VerifiedDeveloper Tools
Summary	Audit your Design System and serve your Agent the rules that keep AI-written UI on-system.	Give your AI hands. One URL. Type a job. Get a receipt. (MIT) execution layer: 120 native tools across 17 products behind one zero-auth remote MCP endpoint.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "roast-my-design-system-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "roast-my-design-system-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zambo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "zambo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons