Roast My Design System vs Safetyreplay MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Roast My Design System and Safetyreplay MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Roast My Design System when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Roast My Design System Details

Choose Safetyreplay MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Paid Service).
• Primary tools included: run_safety_replay, check_policy_gate, record_eval_receipt.

Explore Safetyreplay MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Roast My Design System Developer Tools	Safetyreplay MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Audit your Design System and serve your Agent the rules that keep AI-written UI on-system.	Paid remote MCP for safety replays, policy gates, eval receipts, and release evidence.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "roast-my-design-system-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "shadcn"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "safetyreplay-mcp": {
      "url": "https://safetyreplay.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons