RLM Tools vs Unblu

In-depth architectural comparison of the RLM Tools and Unblu MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose RLM Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore RLM Tools Details

Choose Unblu when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Unblu Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R RLM Tools Finance & Fintech	Unblu Finance & Fintech
Summary	Persistent Python sandbox for token-efficient codebase exploration in MCP clients	Token-efficient MCP server for 300+ Unblu API endpoints
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rlm-tools": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "rlm-tools"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unblu": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "unblu-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons