RIPE Atlas vs Keel

In-depth architectural comparison of the RIPE Atlas and Keel MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose RIPE Atlas when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore RIPE Atlas Details

Choose Keel when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Keel Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	RIPE Atlas Developer Tools	Keel Developer Tools
Summary	RIPE Atlas network measurements — ping, traceroute, DNS, TLS, HTTP, NTP, and probes	Network diagnostics — ping, traceroute, DNS, port scanning, and connectivity testing.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ripe-atlas": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ripe-atlas-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "keel-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sounding-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons