Safety boundary for agent written GitHub PR reviews: pending and invisible, submitting is opt-in
Copy the AI prompt to install this server into Claude Code, Cursor, or another agent β or use 1-click editor setup below.
We haven't yet run this listing's install command through our automated sandbox check. This isn't a red flag β we're steadily working through the catalog.
π‘ Paste the JSON block into your client's configuration file under mcpServers, then restart the application.
Inspect callable tools, capabilities, and parameters exposed to AI agents by ReviewGuard.
get_pr_review_contextGet PR author/message, submitted review summaries, inline review threads with resolved state, reactions and permalinks, and general PR comments
list_pending_reviewList the authenticated user's pending draft review, including all current pending review comments and their permalinks
add_review_commentsAdd one or more comments to the authenticated user's pending review, creating the pending review if needed
modify_review_commentUpdate or delete one comment from the authenticated user's pending review
delete_pending_reviewDelete the authenticated user's pending review and all its comments
submitSubmit the pending review as a real, posted review. The `action` is limited to the allowed set and the review summary always starts with the fixed, server-configured disclaimer
MCP server (review-guard-mcp) that lets AI agents work on GitHub PR reviews behind a safety boundary. The server holds the write-enabled GitHub token and exposes only review operations, so the agent never sees the token. What those operations are allowed to do is fixed at server start, not negotiable by the agent.
A write-enabled GitHub token is needed to create review comments, but giving that token directly to an agent risks accidental or prompt-injected actions: submitting approvals, requesting changes, closing other people's review threads, or touching unrelated repositories. This server sits in between and narrows the token down to exactly the review capabilities you opt into.
The server supports two modes of use:
The agent reads PR discussion context and builds a pending (draft) review. Nothing it writes is visible to anyone else until a human opens the PR, inspects the draft comments, and submits the review themselves. Submission is structurally unreachable: the submit tool is not even registered, and the underlying client refuses every submit action.
Use this when an agent assists a human reviewer, for example in IDE setups (Claude Code, Codex, Theia) where the agent drafts inline comments and the human stays the reviewer of record.
--allow-submit)Started with --allow-submit, the server additionally registers a submit tool so the agent can post the review itself. Guardrails stay in place:
--allow-resolve lets the agent resolve its own review threads (never anyone else's), and --repo/--pr pin the server to a single pull request.Use this for unattended, autonomous review bots, for example a watcher that reviews every PR where a review is requested from the bot account and posts a real (comment-only) review.
Requires Node.js >= 22.
Install globally (makes review-guard-mcp available in PATH):
Or pin to a specific version:
The server is also listed in the MCP Registry
as com.eclipsesource/review-guard, so clients that browse the registry can find
and install it from there. The entry is metadata only, there is no hosted instance
to connect to: it describes the npm package above, which your client installs and
runs locally in the default pending mode.
Requires npm >= 12 and a Node version supported by it (see CONTRIBUTING.md):
| Tool | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
get_pr_review_context | always | Get PR author/message, submitted review summaries, inline review threads with resolved state, reactions and permalinks, and general PR comments |
list_pending_review | always | List the authenticated user's pending draft review, including all current pending review comments and their permalinks |
add_review_comments | always | Add one or more comments to the authenticated user's pending review, creating the pending review if needed |
modify_review_comment | always | Update or delete one comment from the authenticated user's pending review |
delete_pending_review | always | Delete the authenticated user's pending review and all its comments |
submit | --allow-submit | Submit the pending review as a real, posted review. The action is limited to the allowed set and the review summary always starts with the fixed, server-configured disclaimer |
resolve_review_thread | --allow-resolve | Resolve one of the authenticated user's own review threads (e.g. a prior finding the latest push fixed). Refuses threads started by anyone else |
By default the server cannot submit reviews. To allow it, start the server with --allow-submit listing one or more of approve, comment, reject:
--allow-submit <csv> enables the submit tool and restricts its action enum to exactly these values. approve maps to APPROVE, comment to COMMENT, and reject to REQUEST_CHANGES. Invalid actions abort startup.--submit-body <text> sets the fixed review summary prefix posted with every submission. The agent cannot change or remove it and may only append its own summary below it. If omitted while --allow-submit is set, a built-in default disclaimer is used. Its wording adapts to the allowed actions (when approve is not allowed it states the review is not an approval, rather than caveating one). Requires --allow-submit and must not be empty.--allow-resolve registers the resolve_review_thread tool. The client resolves only threads whose first comment was authored by the authenticated user, so a bot can tidy up its own now-fixed findings on a re-review but never close another reviewer's conversation.Without --allow-submit, the submit tool is not registered and the submitReview client method refuses every action, so submission is structurally unreachable.
Start the server with --repo <owner/name> --pr <number> to pin it to one pull
request:
When scoped, every tool drops its owner/repo/pull_number arguments and
acts on that PR only. resolve_review_thread additionally checks that the
thread belongs to it. The client (github.ts) enforces this independently of
the tool schemas, so a caller cannot reach a different PR or repo the token can
otherwise write to. Use this whenever the server backs an automated review of a
known PR (typically together with submit mode), so a prompt-injected agent
cannot post to or resolve threads on unrelated PRs. Both flags are required
together. Omitting them leaves the server unscoped (the caller supplies the PR
per call).
The server runs as a child process managed by the IDE. No port configuration needed.
For MCP clients that use the common JSON config shape (Claude Code, VS Code, Theia):
For Codex, add the server to ~/.codex/config.toml or a trusted project-local
.codex/config.toml:
Or pin to a specific version:
The server runs standalone and exposes a Streamable HTTP endpoint.
Start the server:
Then point your MCP client at the printed URL (e.g. http://127.0.0.1:4000/mcp). Each POST is an independent stateless request.
Codex HTTP configuration uses the same TOML shape:
--host flagBy default the HTTP server binds to 127.0.0.1, which makes it unreachable from containers and other machines. Pass --host <address> to bind one specific address instead. Because the endpoint is unauthenticated, the unspecified addresses (0.0.0.0, ::) are rejected at startup.
The main use case is a reviewing agent that runs inside a container (e.g. a sandboxed agent runtime) and needs to reach the MCP server on the host. On Linux, bind the container network's gateway IP, e.g. for Docker's default bridge (typically 172.17.0.1):
The host firewall must also allow traffic on the MCP port from the container subnet, e.g. with ufw:
No reviews yet β be the first to share how this listing worked for you.
Showcase your server listing on GitHub or your project documentation. Embed this dynamic SVG badge to highlight official listing status and live engagement.
[](https://allmcps.com/mcp/reviewguard)<a href="https://allmcps.com/mcp/reviewguard"><img src="https://allmcps.com/api/badge/reviewguard?style=directory" alt="ReviewGuard on AllMCPs" /></a>