ReputeMap vs Velog

In-depth architectural comparison of the ReputeMap and Velog MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ReputeMap when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_locations, list_reviews, get_review_stats.

Explore ReputeMap Details

V

Choose Velog when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: velog_get_post, velog_list_posts, velog_search_posts.

Explore Velog Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ReputeMap Developer Tools	V Velog Developer Tools
Summary	Read and filter your Google Business Profile reviews, get stats, and send review requests.	Read and write Velog (velog.io), the Korean developer blog. Public publishing is opt-in.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reputemap-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "velog": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@milcho0604/velog-mcp@0.8.10"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons