Repology MCP Server vs Opencage Geocoding MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Repology MCP Server and Opencage Geocoding MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Repology MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query, limit, project_name.

Explore Repology MCP Server Details

Choose Opencage Geocoding MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query, countrycode, bounds.

Explore Opencage Geocoding MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Repology MCP Server Developer Tools	Opencage Geocoding MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server that provides access to Repology package repository data	MCP server for querying the OpenCage geocoding API from within LLMs
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "repology-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "repology-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "opencage-geocoding-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "opencage-geocoding-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons