What is the key difference between Release Gate and GhidraMCP?

Release Gate belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while GhidraMCP belongs to the Security category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Release Gate or GhidraMCP in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Release Gate and GhidraMCP free or paid?

Release Gate operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). GhidraMCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Release Gate lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. GhidraMCP lists 5 tools with 2 views and 9,757 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Release Gate and GhidraMCP together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Release Gate or GhidraMCP in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Release Gate and GhidraMCP free to use, or do they require API keys?

Release Gate is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . GhidraMCP operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Release Gate and GhidraMCP at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both release-gate and lauriewired-ghidramcp as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Release Gate has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. GhidraMCP holds a Quality Score of 56 /100 ( Good ) with 2 views, 0 installs, and 9,757 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Release Gate vs GhidraMCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Release Gate and GhidraMCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Release Gate

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

GhidraMCP

Security · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Release Gate if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose GhidraMCP if your workspace requires Security integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Release Gate when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Release Gate Details

Choose GhidraMCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Decompile binaries using Ghidra, Rename methods and data automatically, List methods, classes, imports, exports.

Explore GhidraMCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Release Gate Security	GhidraMCP LaurieWired Security
Summary	Pre-deploy security auditor for AI agent code — the risks generic SAST misses.	A Model Context Protocol server for Ghidra that enables LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications. Provides tools for decompiling binaries, renaming methods and data, and listing methods, classes, imports, and exports.
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Release Gate Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

GhidraMCP Tools (5)

Decompile binaries using Ghidra

Rename methods and data automatically

List methods, classes, imports, exports

MCP server with Ghidra plugin

Configurable HTTP server port

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Release Gate Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "release-gate": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "release-gate"
      ]
    }
  }
}

GhidraMCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lauriewired-ghidramcp": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue.svg)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Release Gate is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, GhidraMCP belongs to Security using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Release Gate when you need capabilities focused on security and GhidraMCP when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Release Gate More alternatives to GhidraMCP Security category hub Canonical compare URL