Relaystation vs Telemost MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Relaystation and Telemost MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose Relaystation when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Relaystation Details

Choose Telemost MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Telemost MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R Relaystation Communication	Telemost MCP Server Communication
Summary	Pay-per-call agent infrastructure: file storage & handoff, compute tools, messaging, e-sign, KYC.	Telegram channel analytics and statistics for AI agents, pay-per-call in USDC via x402.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "relaystation": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "relaystation"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "telemost-mcp-server-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "telemost-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons