RelayShield Security Intelligence vs UI5 MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the RelayShield Security Intelligence and UI5 MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

R

Choose RelayShield Security Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_breach, check_sim_swap, check_domain_lookalikes.

Explore RelayShield Security Intelligence Details

Choose UI5 MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_integration_card, create_ui5_app, get_api_reference.

Explore UI5 MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	R RelayShield Security Intelligence Developer Tools	UI5 MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Breach detection, SIM swap, domain lookalikes, OAuth watchlist, URL scanning. Subscription or PAYG.	MCP server for UI5 application development
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "relayshield-security-intelligence": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "relayshield-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-80": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "with"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons