Redact Pdf MCP vs Techtenstein Pdf

In-depth architectural comparison of the Redact Pdf MCP and Techtenstein Pdf MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Redact Pdf MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Redact Pdf MCP Details

Choose Techtenstein Pdf when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Techtenstein Pdf Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Redact Pdf MCP Developer Tools	Techtenstein Pdf Developer Tools
Summary	Permanently redact PII from PDFs. The text is removed, not covered. OCR for scanned documents.	PDF text and table extraction plus metadata. Supports OCR for scanned documents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "redact-pdf-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "redact-pdf-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "techtenstein-pdf": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "techtenstein-pdf-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons